Was FOX News Bribed To Take Tucker Carlson Off The Air?

By Dr. Jake Baker

Tucker Carlson should be honored by the price that was put on his head. In what is undoubtedly the largest bribe ever paid for a media assassination, FOX News/NewsCorp collected approximately $1.35 billion to stab Tucker in the back. 

I’ll tell you how the scheme worked, but first, let’s figure out why FOX and their co-conspirator, BlackRock, Inc., both wanted to make this happen. 

Rupert Murdoch and his sons, Lachlan (51 years) and James (49 years) have run FOX News since its inception. But in July of 2020, his son James left the family media business to pursue a more “Soros” type endeavor, moving heavily into leftist progressive causes, stating, “My resignation is due to disagreements over certain editorial content published by the company’s news outlets and certain other strategic decisions.”

But the truth is that the younger Murdoch has since emerged as a backer of progressive and environmental concerns, ploughing millions into the defeat of President Donald Trump, climate activism, and other political causes.  This was, and is, undoubtedly part of the real overall agenda.  James’ departure left Lachlan in charge of the sprawling $70 billion Murdoch media empire.

Enter Tucker Carlson. 

Tucker Carlson – A Two-Edged Sword.  Over the last several years Tucker has emerged as the FOX News star, no longer playing second fiddle to a fading Sean Hannity. According to published reports, Tucker was making between $20 -$30 million a year.  A hefty salary but considering his economic value of $50 million in combined ad revenue on his show, and the audience carryover he brought to the rest of the night’s news lineup, he was worth every penny of it.  But that’s just the tip of the iceberg.  Tucker’s real value is his value in FOX News Stock price. 

To give you an example of how much Carlson brought to the network, when he was removed from air, FOX stock dropped by more than 5% or about $500-$600 million.  Granted, FOX knows that they will recapture some of that “shock” loss over a period of several months.  Additionally, Rupert Murdoch only owns a 39% share in the company, so he didn’t take the full brunt of the loss.  But, in reality, it probably cost him about $130 million.  So why would anyone choose to sever $130 million in revenue?

We know that both Murdoch Sr. and son Lachlan are committed leftists but are they ideological enough to give up $130 million a year?  Probably not, but what if you could devise a scheme get paid $1.35 billion for taking a $130 million hit and get rid of Tucker Carlson all at the same time?

The Scheme Unfolds.

That’s exactly what happened.  Both BlackRock and Dodge & Cox (a very large investment firm which is entangled with BlackRock) have large stakes in FOX News.  BlackRock now owns 45,743,746 shares of FOX, which is worth approximately $1.35 billion.  Dodge & Cox owns another 12 million shares or more. 

But that is not the end of the story for either company.  They also have subordinate funds and investment groups that own FOX stock.  Their recent stock purchases of FOX News stock has increased FOX’s available capital by reportedly as much as $135 billion. 

Meanwhile, the Four Companies of the Apocalypse (FCOTA), BlackRock, Inc., Vanguard, Fidelity Investment, and Main Street Capital Corporation, along with their various funds, nearly match Rupert Murdoch’s ownership of 39%.  A capital influx of $135 billion is not bad for a company with an estimated value of $15-$20 billion. 

These four companies and their entangled business interests reportedly control 83% of all the profits generated last year on a global basis.  BlackRock alone controls $143 trillion in global assets. The FCOTA combined control between $250 and $300 trillion dollars or more than 70% of the wealth of the entire planet.  

So, why would any company want to take a $130 million hit to get rid of Tucker Carlson?  Simple … Tucker Carlson was costing them much more than that.

Because of his annoying truth telling, Tucker Carlson was becoming a problem for FCOTA.  His constant attacks on crooked big pharma were a contributor to declining stock prices for Pfizer, Moderna, and the rest of the drug cartel.  In fact, Pfizer’s stock is down about 11% and for a $220 billion company, that is a $22 billion loss. 

Further, BlackRock and the other members of the FCOTA are profiting heavily from the war in Ukraine.  To date, the U.S. has committed $130 billion to Ukraine, while the EU has spent about $70 billion.  That’s a total of $200 billion.  The war business is very profitable for a company like BlackRock and their fellow corporate oligarchs. 

Through their energy interests, logistics, delivery, defense industry and construction interests, BlackRock and their fellow oligarchs are making tens of billions on the nice little war in Ukraine, sponsored by Joe Biden and the Biden Junta.  Tucker railed tirelessly against the war in Ukraine. I could drone on in great detail about the business alliances of the FCOTA, but suffice it to say, Tucker was costing them tens of billions of dollars. 

Remember, Carlson specifically named BlackRock in some of his reportage.  When one begins lifting the veil that hides the demonic nature of the NWO and their dark plans for a global reset spiritual forces are set into motion. Now, couple the ideological/spiritual malignancy embraced by both BlackRock and the FCOTA, along with the hatred of the Murdoch Clan for Carlson’s positions, and one is left wondering how he survived as long as he did. 

In summation, while this was undoubtedly the most expensive media assassination in history, for the FCOTA and the Murdochs, it was cheap at twice the price.